Re: [-empyre-] misogyny

[Aliette <aliette@criticalsecret.org>]

Any problems with global sexism allegation :

1. whatever the human heterosexual homosexual or other sexual genre of
relationships of body all both or separate are sexualized from a traditional
division of sexes structured by the reproduction of the species and
following the ideological mode of society and the traditional social
division of the work for the resources.

The pleasure itself is cultivated in this way from the immemorial times of
humanity even between the same sex as playing two.

Transgressing this reality it is not "natural"; it is an object of critical
analysis and work in common or personal, can be political, can be social.
Even the realized socialist or communist societies did not transgress it or
just in matter of equal productive work...


2. BUT both time even at the poor peoples or workers, traditionally the
culture of pleasure in sex is not that one of the violence but that one of
the desire of sensual delight as a high level of culture to each one as well
freedom as well beauty as well happiness. It is known that may be the first
sign of high civilization is not the one of the tools but the moment the
woman and the men have practiced another inter sexual position that the
primitive one. More : from this practice in the life the solider
relationship between men and women as well at home as well in the factory
was coming. There was the capitalist bourgeoisie more the bosses who were
imposing the worst of the sexual division in the productive society, and you
know perfectly why. Not the peoples; that was not their interest.

Being apart the singular cases of violent affects or personalities or the
effect of alcohols or drugs, which always have existed, the collective
situation particularly of exploited classes is quite the reverse.
 
The only violence in it having been of the consequence into the reproduction
at the moment women were not in situation to protect themselves of being
pregnant. But not being the violence of the sexual relationship itself at
the moment of the delightful meeting.

The question resulting is : from which point of the following modern then
post modern society the metamorphosis or the disappearance of the sensual
delight collectively exist. And more turning sexual things into violent
captions globally representative?


3. What is obvious at the moment we reach the one moment when it is not
necessary to have a natural mode of reproduction of human but otherwise
available to artificially reproduce, it is that far from disappearing the
sexism impact can be the real material violence can be the simulated
violence through the games (may be living games in which reborning real the
violence), the sexist attacks increase by an unbelievable and unpredictable
way... That tends globally to the social relationship into sexist violence
nowadays and whatever the class (you know perfectly that the most well
shared sexual offence is the paedophile incest including in the Christian
bourgeois families ?notoriously in Europe).

Why? And since and till which point?


4. The question is as well of the disappearance of the culture like former
transmission of convivial relationship, can be at home can be at school, can
be in the poorest cities, can be in the traditional villages losing their
traditions of subsistence.

We hope stop reading racist allegations concerning the different West or
South cultures about sexist allegations all both becoming a top market of
the irresponsible leak in front of the object of the debate.


5. Now, please: what of seduction? That is not sexual relationship but
calling to other world even it would uses sometimes sexual or sexed
attributes. 

I do not think that seductive can be mixed or remixed with sexual without a
lot of precautions. Seduction is not of the body even using the body
seduction is concept and defy. In real seduction is no sex, not generation.
It only exists as a sort of evil that could be a neutral energy...

A.